Cambridge
High
Impact
Research
Project

‍ ‍

Sun 29 Nov 2026 — Fri 29 Jan 2027

Apply here by Mon 16 Nov 2026

The Cambridge High Impact Project (’CHIRP’) is a mentored vacation research programme.

You’ll choose a project from our list and produce legible output, working in cause areas that are Impactful, Neglected and Tractable. Think of it as a research stint but remote!

Our projects

[AI Safety and Governance] Can regulators independently assess whether developers can detect and report deceptive-evasion incidents?

[Biosecurity] How should newly identified viruses be prioritised for further research and experimental characterisation?

[AI Safety and Governance] Run a Whitehall Crisis Workshop

[Biosecurity] State of field analysis for regulation in DNA synthesis screening

[Animal Welfare] Suffering Adjusted Days (SAD) burden modelling for milkfish farmed in Indonesia and the Philippines

[Global Health and Development] Consequences of USAID cuts on maternal health in Kenya

[Animal Welfare] AI governance for animals: what should farm AI measure? Where are frontier models governed?

The programme

What you get

Mentorship from a domain expert and methodological support from a research manager.

Research experience in a high-impact cause area during the winter vacation - you don’t have to wait for summer!

Written work you can show when applying for further opportunities in that area.

What we ask

6–10 hours a week from Mon 30 Nov 2026 to Fri 29 Jan 2027. You can take one week off at a time agreed with your mentor.

Kickoff day on Sun 29 Nov 2026, where you meet your mentor and team and scope your research.

Two rounds of drafting and a presentation in February.

What people have said

CHIRP last ran in Lent 2026, with thirteen participants in six teams. Projects covered sociotechnical AI safety, biosecurity governance, wellbeing as a measure for public policy, food insecurity in conflict settings and evaluations for protein design tools. One team presented its work on evaluations as a conference poster.

“My research and writing skills and my understanding of the field greatly increased. I learnt how to conduct research in a team, and built fantastic relationships alongside.”

— Lorien Bray, global health team

“Being told that the programme prioritised my growth as a researcher rather than the research itself helped me allow myself to make mistakes, which is crucial for learning.”

— Rio Thomas, biosecurity team

Questions